Loaded false positive study data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\HL\3.98\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequences_1.mat
max_rotation=0 r=0 n=1 a=CAAG FASTA(n).Sequence=CAAG
pJAR3DFalsePositiveStudy Timestamp 18-Jul-2025 23:23:24
Evaluating how sequences fit models
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -6.70, deficit  2.69, CutoffScore  40.10, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UAAA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.50, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.44, deficit  1.24, CutoffScore  86.98, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -5.63, deficit -1.04, CutoffScore  47.79, ed  2, 2 cWW-F                                   
CUGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.44, deficit  1.24, CutoffScore  86.98, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  57.77, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.24, deficit  2.04, CutoffScore  78.57, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.24, deficit  2.04, CutoffScore  78.57, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.27, deficit  0.06, CutoffScore  67.82, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GCAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -6.12, deficit -1.09, CutoffScore  48.31, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.19, deficit  1.99, CutoffScore  79.10, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGUA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.08, CutoffScore  99.20, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.63, deficit  3.43, CutoffScore  63.86, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.39, deficit  1.19, CutoffScore  87.51, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUAU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.24, deficit  1.04, CutoffScore  89.10, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.42, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  45.20, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.20, deficit  4.00, CutoffScore  57.91, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
UCGA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -6.17, deficit  2.39, CutoffScore  43.31, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.27, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.63, deficit  3.43, CutoffScore  63.86, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UACA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.19, deficit  1.99, CutoffScore  79.04, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
ACAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -6.24, deficit -0.97, CutoffScore  47.03, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GUGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.24, deficit  2.04, CutoffScore  78.57, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -6.09, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  44.18, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CCAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.15, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  47.94, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.42, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  45.20, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AGAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.63, deficit  3.43, CutoffScore  63.86, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.28, deficit  3.08, CutoffScore  67.54, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGUU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.08, CutoffScore  99.20, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.39, deficit  1.19, CutoffScore  87.51, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.22, deficit  3.02, CutoffScore  68.24, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.28, deficit  3.08, CutoffScore  67.54, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUUA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.83, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -5.11, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  98.75, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGAAU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.98, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  91.58, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUUGC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_32392.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.81, deficit  0.14, CutoffScore  98.51, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GAAUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -4.95, deficit  0.42, CutoffScore  95.61, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGUGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_78677.1,  3 NTs,                  UUCG,score      -5.68, deficit  1.79, CutoffScore  49.56, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGCGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -6.98, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  34.74, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
UUUCA 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.96, deficit  2.76, CutoffScore  70.98, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUCG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.08, deficit  0.24, CutoffScore  65.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, CutoffScore  96.13, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.30, deficit  3.10, CutoffScore  67.33, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGGAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.69, deficit  1.15, CutoffScore  56.33, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UUGCA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.51, deficit  1.30, CutoffScore  86.28, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CUGGG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.96, deficit  2.03, CutoffScore  78.67, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAAU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -6.10, deficit  2.92, CutoffScore  69.21, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUGUG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.19, deficit  0.06, CutoffScore  99.32, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AAUCU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.24, deficit  4.04, CutoffScore  57.52, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_55195.3,  3 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -6.50, deficit  3.49, CutoffScore  63.31, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, CutoffScore  92.32, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGUGG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.96, deficit  1.43, CutoffScore  53.39, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UGUUA 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.33, deficit  0.21, CutoffScore  66.24, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GCUCC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -6.81, deficit  0.14, CutoffScore  66.99, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
ACAAU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.19, deficit  1.06, CutoffScore  57.28, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUCAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.44, deficit  3.24, CutoffScore  65.87, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCGUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.50, deficit  4.30, CutoffScore  54.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGAUU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.54, deficit  0.33, CutoffScore  65.00, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.82, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  54.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GAUCU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -9.36, deficit  6.16, CutoffScore  35.16, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAUCC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.00, deficit  3.80, CutoffScore  60.00, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AAAAU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -5.13, deficit  0.14, CutoffScore  98.53, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUCAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -6.80, deficit  2.26, CutoffScore  76.17, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -4.99, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.30, deficit  3.10, CutoffScore  67.33, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.30, deficit  3.10, CutoffScore  67.33, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, CutoffScore  96.13, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -4.99, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUAAU 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.54, deficit  3.34, CutoffScore  64.84, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUUU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -7.62, deficit  2.50, CutoffScore  42.15, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
AGAGU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -6.09, deficit  1.55, CutoffScore  52.09, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.69, deficit  1.15, CutoffScore  56.33, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UUGAA 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -6.67, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.42, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGAUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.46, deficit  0.25, CutoffScore  65.77, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, CutoffScore  92.32, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAUUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.04, deficit  1.03, CutoffScore  89.14, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUUC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score     -10.36, deficit  4.93, CutoffScore  48.12, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUGGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.30, deficit  2.36, CutoffScore  75.13, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CCGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_60914.1,  3 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.35, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUUUC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score     -10.36, deficit  4.93, CutoffScore  48.12, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UUUUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score     -12.17, deficit  6.74, CutoffScore  29.09, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUUAC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_46501.1,  5 NTs,                CUGAAG,score      -4.44, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  98.75, ed  2, 0 cWW-cWS                                 
GACAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -6.19, deficit  1.65, CutoffScore  82.59, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUUCG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.55, deficit  0.43, CutoffScore  95.45, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGAGAU 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -4.64, deficit  2.88, CutoffScore  69.97, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGUCAA 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -6.56, deficit  0.46, CutoffScore  63.55, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UAAGAA 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -6.25, deficit  0.66, CutoffScore  93.10, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAAUGG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_52953.3,  6 NTs,                GGAAAC,score      -5.73, deficit  1.53, CutoffScore  83.87, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AGUUGU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.79, deficit -0.12, CutoffScore  69.73, ed  3, 1 cWW                                     
CUUUCG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.55, deficit  0.43, CutoffScore  95.45, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AAAAUU 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.13, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAAAAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.80, deficit  4.04, CutoffScore  57.90, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAAAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUUCGC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -2.87, deficit  0.93, CutoffScore  90.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
CUUUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.20, deficit  3.00, CutoffScore  68.46, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCCAGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_59843.1,  6 NTs,               UCAAUGA,score      -7.71, deficit  1.96, CutoffScore  16.21, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUAAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.28, deficit  0.18, CutoffScore  66.48, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGAAGG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -4.90, deficit  3.15, CutoffScore  67.21, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUGAGC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_55195.3,  3 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -5.37, deficit  2.36, CutoffScore  75.19, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUAUGC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_86883.1,  5 NTs,                GUAUUC,score      -4.07, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  51.48, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGUCGG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -7.37, deficit  1.53, CutoffScore  52.35, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGGAUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score     -10.14, deficit  6.13, CutoffScore  35.48, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGUGUU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.79, deficit -0.12, CutoffScore  69.73, ed  3, 1 cWW                                     
GCAUAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_62934.1,  6 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -6.44, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  57.78, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSH-F                               
UUGGCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -9.91, deficit  3.81, CutoffScore  28.27, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUGCG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -6.07, deficit  0.94, CutoffScore  58.49, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGUUUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -5.52, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CACACG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -9.33, deficit  3.39, CutoffScore  32.71, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAGAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.82, deficit  1.88, CutoffScore  48.62, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GAGGUC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -5.47, deficit  0.59, CutoffScore  62.23, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-cSH                               
CCUUAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.24, deficit  0.56, CutoffScore  62.49, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGACUC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.23, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.84, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGAAAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGCAUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.68, deficit  5.92, CutoffScore  38.29, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUCGAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -6.88, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  63.04, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGUCAA 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -6.56, deficit  0.46, CutoffScore  63.55, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UAAACA 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.82, deficit  5.06, CutoffScore  47.23, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAUCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -6.28, deficit  1.81, CutoffScore  80.96, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGGAGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.13, deficit  6.37, CutoffScore  33.64, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAUGCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -6.26, deficit  2.53, CutoffScore  44.36, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUAAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.38, deficit  0.28, CutoffScore  65.45, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
AGAACU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_22584.6,  5 NTs,               GAAACAC,score     -10.79, deficit  8.40, CutoffScore  25.60, ed  2, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
GGACCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -5.77, deficit  1.30, CutoffScore  54.76, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAAUC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.28, deficit  0.15, CutoffScore  98.47, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAGAUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -6.20, deficit  1.31, CutoffScore  54.58, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-cSH                               
UUUAAA 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.11, deficit  0.63, CutoffScore  61.78, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
AUAUGU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -7.60, deficit -0.63, CutoffScore  43.50, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CCACGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -5.79, deficit  3.85, CutoffScore  61.45, ed  1, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
GAUCGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.10, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.13, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUCGAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -6.88, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  63.04, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUAAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.78, deficit  0.31, CutoffScore  65.16, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUUUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.20, deficit  3.00, CutoffScore  68.46, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAAAAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_15574.1,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -5.13, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.81, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCAGUAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_50537.6,  5 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score      -7.65, deficit -0.43, CutoffScore  77.21, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGCCGAA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -8.45, deficit  3.98, CutoffScore  58.16, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGAGUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -7.10, deficit  2.10, CutoffScore  81.87, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUCAUAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -6.91, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  67.18, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUCAAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -7.55, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  47.85, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGCGGCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -7.27, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  28.62, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAACCCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_22584.6,  5 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -8.08, deficit  5.69, CutoffScore  49.61, ed  2, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
GAGCGUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_89893.1,  6 NTs,               CAGAGCG,score      -6.91, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  32.73, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AUUAAAU 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -7.68, deficit  1.43, CutoffScore  54.36, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUUGGGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -8.44, deficit  2.77, CutoffScore  39.23, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
GUUUAAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_08100.1,  5 NTs,               CCUCGCG,score      -5.54, deficit  0.45, CutoffScore  95.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CCAAUCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_59843.1,  6 NTs,               UCAAUGA,score      -6.65, deficit  0.90, CutoffScore  58.97, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CCAAAAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -7.06, deficit  1.46, CutoffScore  53.04, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUAACAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score     -10.27, deficit  8.51, CutoffScore  11.26, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGCAGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -8.95, deficit  3.35, CutoffScore  33.12, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGGUACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_67667.2,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -6.96, deficit  2.56, CutoffScore  19.90, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
AUCGAAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_10453.3,  7 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.08, deficit  2.49, CutoffScore  23.27, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAAAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.42, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  54.82, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CACUGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -6.99, deficit  0.53, CutoffScore  94.47, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAAAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.42, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  54.82, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGUAAAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -7.20, deficit  0.95, CutoffScore  59.32, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUGGUUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -7.18, deficit  1.71, CutoffScore  50.43, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUGACAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -6.83, deficit  2.36, CutoffScore  43.59, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUCCUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -8.06, deficit  2.39, CutoffScore  43.25, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
GUUCAUC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_25967.2,  7 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -4.95, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  71.59, ed  1, 1 cWW-cWW-F-F-F                           
AGUAGCU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_89893.1,  6 NTs,               CAGAGCG,score      -8.23, deficit  3.59, CutoffScore  21.99, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAGGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -9.57, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGUCGGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -9.02, deficit  3.42, CutoffScore  32.40, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
AUCUCAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.83, deficit  1.15, CutoffScore  56.28, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
UCAAAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.01, deficit  0.34, CutoffScore  64.87, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
CCAAAAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -7.06, deficit  1.46, CutoffScore  53.04, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUGACCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_89893.1,  6 NTs,               CAGAGCG,score      -8.21, deficit  3.57, CutoffScore  22.16, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUUAAAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -7.34, deficit  1.09, CutoffScore  57.83, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCCAUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_59843.1,  6 NTs,               UCAAUGA,score      -8.33, deficit  2.58, CutoffScore  41.21, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUGUUAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -8.46, deficit  2.41, CutoffScore  43.03, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGGCGUA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_37369.2,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -4.05, deficit  0.70, CutoffScore  72.05, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
CUGAAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.28, deficit  2.18, CutoffScore  45.46, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGUAAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -7.12, deficit  0.88, CutoffScore  60.06, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAAUGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_59735.5,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -7.28, deficit  1.94, CutoffScore  48.00, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAAGUUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_80922.2,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -7.05, deficit -0.51, CutoffScore  42.22, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F                               
GGUGAUC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -7.23, deficit  0.98, CutoffScore  58.97, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUCAAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.04, deficit -0.36, CutoffScore  40.62, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAAAAAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_15574.1,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -5.13, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.81, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUUAGCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -7.40, deficit  1.73, CutoffScore  50.17, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
GCAAUUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -8.23, deficit  2.63, CutoffScore  40.69, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CCGCGUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -8.37, deficit  2.78, CutoffScore  39.20, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGCUAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -9.82, deficit  4.30, CutoffScore  23.19, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUUAUC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_25967.2,  7 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -4.44, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-cWW-F-F-F                           
GUUUUUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.61, deficit  2.68, CutoffScore  71.81, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CAAACGCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -11.10, deficit  4.60, CutoffScore  27.41, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CCAGCGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_18565.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -11.23, deficit  6.07, CutoffScore  27.03, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CUCAUGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_21372.1,  5 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score     -12.59, deficit  4.34, CutoffScore  14.72, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-cSH-F-F                           
CUUUCGAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -7.54, deficit  1.09, CutoffScore  88.48, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UCAAAAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_02817.2,  6 NTs,              CCAAAUAG,score      -7.48, deficit  2.69, CutoffScore  52.47, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGUAACUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score      -6.34, deficit  0.55, CutoffScore  66.83, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
GUUGAAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score      -6.67, deficit  0.88, CutoffScore  63.75, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CAUCUUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -9.72, deficit  1.90, CutoffScore  50.48, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUCGCUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26934.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -7.10, deficit  3.34, CutoffScore  41.81, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CCAGGAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_99748.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -8.05, deficit  1.35, CutoffScore  41.89, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-cSH                             
CGGGAACG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score      -8.36, deficit  1.79, CutoffScore  81.17, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UGUUUGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50318.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -9.32, deficit  3.31, CutoffScore  25.22, ed  3, 2 cWW-cSH-F-F                             
GAUUCUAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -7.64, deficit  1.19, CutoffScore  55.90, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGCCCGCA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -12.00, deficit  6.43, CutoffScore  30.29, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
CAAUUCGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score     -10.45, deficit  3.97, CutoffScore  34.32, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUGGAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_01609.3,  7 NTs,              CUGGAAAG,score      -9.18, deficit  4.42, CutoffScore  40.73, ed  2, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
CUAGCUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score     -11.06, deficit  3.32, CutoffScore  38.95, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UUCUAAUA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_10453.3,  7 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score     -10.80, deficit  5.20, CutoffScore  25.83, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUGUUGAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -9.43, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  23.03, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGGUUGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42046.2,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score     -10.60, deficit  5.96, CutoffScore   1.26, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSS-F-F-F                           
AUUUCAAU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -7.13, deficit  0.68, CutoffScore  61.26, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAUGAGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_42998.2,  8 NTs,              GAAACAAC,score      -5.88, deficit  3.15, CutoffScore  50.64, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUUGGAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_01609.3,  7 NTs,              CUGGAAAG,score      -7.82, deficit  3.06, CutoffScore  51.58, ed  1, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
GGAUUCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.28, deficit  0.27, CutoffScore  42.49, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
UCACGAAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_15802.1,  7 NTs,             ACUCUGGAU,score     -11.89, deficit  5.69, CutoffScore   8.19, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F                           
CUGGAAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_01609.3,  7 NTs,              CUGGAAAG,score      -6.03, deficit  1.27, CutoffScore  89.84, ed  0, 0 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
UGGAAGGA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.50, deficit  1.06, CutoffScore  57.23, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCGGAUGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_09452.1,  5 NTs,             UAGGGGCUA,score      -9.77, deficit  1.06, CutoffScore  13.34, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUCAUCUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_77082.1,  8 NTs,              CCGAAAAG,score     -10.00, deficit  2.50, CutoffScore  23.62, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UGAGGAAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_42998.2,  8 NTs,              GAAACAAC,score      -8.13, deficit  5.40, CutoffScore  32.57, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AGAAUGGU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -7.68, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  44.77, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UUGCUCAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score     -10.15, deficit  2.13, CutoffScore  25.37, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
CGCACACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_80362.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score     -10.47, deficit  3.40, CutoffScore  33.36, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUAUUUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score     -10.04, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  19.86, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUCGAAAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_01609.3,  7 NTs,              CUGGAAAG,score      -8.52, deficit  3.76, CutoffScore  45.95, ed  3, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
GAAGUAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_02817.2,  6 NTs,              CCAAAUAG,score      -8.65, deficit  3.86, CutoffScore  42.68, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGUUUAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_42046.2,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -7.07, deficit  2.44, CutoffScore  55.13, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSS-F-F-F                           
AUCAGGUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.98, deficit  2.59, CutoffScore   9.60, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UGAAAAUA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_39243.1,  6 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -8.94, deficit  1.93, CutoffScore  48.09, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGUUGCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_42046.2,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -8.68, deficit  4.05, CutoffScore  41.85, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSS-F-F-F                           
GAUAAAGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_84299.4,  8 NTs,             GAUAGUGGC,score      -6.41, deficit  1.12, CutoffScore  70.59, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGAGAGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -8.68, deficit  0.94, CutoffScore  61.93, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UAAUCUAA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_26934.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -9.60, deficit  5.84, CutoffScore  26.23, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGAACGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_42998.2,  8 NTs,              GAAACAAC,score      -7.53, deficit  4.80, CutoffScore  37.44, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AGUGAAGU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -12.07, deficit  3.33, CutoffScore  51.59, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUCAUUAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_99748.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -9.29, deficit  2.59, CutoffScore  32.08, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSH                             
UUGGUGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85367.2,  8 NTs,             CUGGGGCGG,score     -11.86, deficit  7.12, CutoffScore   7.92, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUAGAAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27670.2,  6 NTs,             GUGACAGCC,score      -8.99, deficit  3.56, CutoffScore  26.80, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F                             
GAUAGACC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_47854.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -6.01, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  66.87, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CACCGAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score      -9.08, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore   7.83, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAACAAUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score      -9.95, deficit  0.20, CutoffScore  68.65, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UUGCGGACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_07951.3,  4 NTs,             CAGCGGAAG,score     -13.78, deficit  4.04, CutoffScore  18.20, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CUGGUGAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_01609.3,  7 NTs,              CUGGAAAG,score     -12.55, deficit  7.79, CutoffScore  13.74, ed  2, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
GAUACUUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.82, deficit  4.08, CutoffScore  34.03, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGCGGAACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_07951.3,  4 NTs,             CAGCGGAAG,score     -13.94, deficit  4.20, CutoffScore  16.89, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GAGAUUUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score      -9.36, deficit  1.62, CutoffScore  30.47, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AGAGGAAAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score      -9.49, deficit  4.86, CutoffScore  32.38, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
AUAAAGCCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -10.90, deficit  4.39, CutoffScore   8.25, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UGAAGGAUA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score      -8.63, deficit  1.16, CutoffScore  37.83, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGUGUGCAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -11.28, deficit  3.91, CutoffScore  16.16, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGGAGUACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -11.13, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  12.84, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AAAAACAUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.70, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  43.85, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAAAACGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -9.11, deficit  3.75, CutoffScore  34.99, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GGGUGGGAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score      -9.40, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  47.21, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
UGAUAGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -9.27, deficit  2.82, CutoffScore  38.71, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUACAGAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -8.84, deficit  3.22, CutoffScore  32.09, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
AGCAUUGAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_80241.1,  9 NTs,             UGGUUUCCA,score      -9.69, deficit  2.84, CutoffScore  31.66, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGUUUUUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_80241.1,  9 NTs,             UGGUUUCCA,score      -9.17, deficit  2.33, CutoffScore  35.63, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GAAAGAUAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score     -10.24, deficit  5.61, CutoffScore  27.73, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
GGUUCUUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_32735.2,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score      -7.74, deficit  4.11, CutoffScore  40.13, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
UUUGCGAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_80008.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score     -11.32, deficit  4.83, CutoffScore  42.02, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
CUUUUGAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score      -9.99, deficit  1.25, CutoffScore  21.58, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AUGACCCAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score     -12.00, deficit  3.08, CutoffScore   6.41, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW                                 
AUCAACUCU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_80362.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score      -9.87, deficit  2.80, CutoffScore  16.32, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F                               
GACCUUUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -12.52, deficit  2.12, CutoffScore  14.52, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAAUUUUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score     -11.91, deficit  2.99, CutoffScore   7.12, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW                                 
CGGUUCGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_18978.1,  9 NTs,            CUGUUCGCAG,score      -8.63, deficit  2.45, CutoffScore  55.00, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F                       
CGAUCAAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -11.19, deficit  5.82, CutoffScore  21.14, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GUACUAAUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_27670.2,  6 NTs,             GUGACAGCC,score      -8.26, deficit  2.83, CutoffScore  55.35, ed  1, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F                             
GUUGAUUUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_87463.1,  9 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score     -11.21, deficit  5.60, CutoffScore  35.84, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAACGAGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_07951.3,  4 NTs,             CAGCGGAAG,score     -10.72, deficit  0.99, CutoffScore  18.62, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F                                 
AAUAAAAAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_84299.4,  8 NTs,             GAUAGUGGC,score      -8.39, deficit  3.10, CutoffScore  56.48, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGAUAAAUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -11.10, deficit  5.73, CutoffScore  21.76, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CAAGAAGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score      -8.06, deficit  1.64, CutoffScore  63.82, ed  3, 1 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
AGGGUAAAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_10540.1,  7 NTs,               CCGAAGG,score      -9.48, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  49.24, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCACAUUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_80362.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score     -10.36, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  12.84, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAAUGAGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_66853.7,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -12.63, deficit  5.28, CutoffScore  31.09, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWS-F-cSH                           
CAAUUAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_66853.7,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score      -9.66, deficit  2.32, CutoffScore  30.87, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWS-F-cSH                           
GUUUCAGGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_18565.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score      -7.81, deficit  2.64, CutoffScore  29.58, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
UUCCACACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_80362.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score      -9.17, deficit  2.10, CutoffScore  42.57, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGAUCGAGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -11.31, deficit  5.94, CutoffScore  20.38, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CUAUAAAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -10.68, deficit  5.31, CutoffScore  24.55, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GAGUCAUCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score      -9.98, deficit  0.24, CutoffScore  38.97, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AUGAGCCCU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score      -9.09, deficit  3.75, CutoffScore  25.66, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F                         
UUUAAACAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score     -10.97, deficit  5.18, CutoffScore  23.64, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
GGCCAGCUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -15.67, deficit  8.38, CutoffScore  31.50, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUCGCUGCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -13.38, deficit  7.81, CutoffScore  22.56, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
GUUAAGAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -10.04, deficit  1.30, CutoffScore  44.19, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGGGAAGAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18565.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -11.49, deficit  6.32, CutoffScore  25.51, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CCAAAAACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -9.88, deficit  3.44, CutoffScore  17.75, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGUGCUCCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85434.1, 10 NTs,            GGUAUCCCAC,score     -10.49, deficit  4.91, CutoffScore  26.46, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AUGAAGUUUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -9.83, deficit  5.55, CutoffScore  35.57, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
GCGGUCUUUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.66, deficit  3.92, CutoffScore  15.40, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAGAAAAAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -8.63, deficit  0.71, CutoffScore  31.26, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
GGAGAUAGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -12.86, deficit  4.95, CutoffScore   1.31, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
CCUCGGUUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -12.73, deficit  4.64, CutoffScore  17.19, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
CAAGUAAGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_57863.1,  8 NTs,            GAAGGAGGUC,score     -10.25, deficit  5.23, CutoffScore  35.97, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F                       
CUCAUCUAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -12.54, deficit  4.40, CutoffScore  10.98, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUCAAAAUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -7.13, deficit  2.85, CutoffScore  67.36, ed  1, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
GGACCGAGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score      -8.52, deficit  0.45, CutoffScore  60.89, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAGUUAUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_66853.7,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -12.81, deficit  5.47, CutoffScore  11.64, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWS-F-cSH                           
GUUAUUCACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_45785.1, 10 NTs,           GUUCCCUCACC,score     -13.66, deficit  7.14, CutoffScore  17.41, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F                     
CGAAAAAAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -10.41, deficit  1.07, CutoffScore  24.62, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAAAAAGAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20781.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -10.24, deficit  2.38, CutoffScore  60.40, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
ACCAUUGCUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_69139.1,  9 NTs,            UCUUUUAUUG,score     -13.07, deficit  3.07, CutoffScore   0.65, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUAACCAACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98864.1, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -11.57, deficit  6.94, CutoffScore  20.07, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AGUGUGGAUU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score      -9.11, deficit  0.96, CutoffScore  73.66, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUUGGAACGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score     -13.21, deficit  8.14, CutoffScore  19.75, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUAAAUGUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -12.39, deficit  2.65, CutoffScore  15.37, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUCAAAAUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -10.50, deficit  6.22, CutoffScore  31.85, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
GGUUGUUGCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score     -11.08, deficit  3.35, CutoffScore   9.77, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAAAGGCAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -10.53, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  44.00, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CACAAUAGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -11.54, deficit  4.47, CutoffScore  17.84, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAAAUCAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -10.44, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  69.31, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AGUCCUUUAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_24792.1,  6 NTs,            GCCCGUUAUC,score      -9.87, deficit  3.45, CutoffScore  12.99, ed  4, 4 cWW-cWS-F-F-F                           
CUAUAAAGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -11.39, deficit  3.48, CutoffScore  11.72, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
CAAAACCAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04641.1,  7 NTs,            CAAGACGACG,score     -11.05, deficit  4.60, CutoffScore  15.16, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAUUCAGAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -14.74, deficit  5.45, CutoffScore  12.63, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
AGAAAUAGUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score     -14.36, deficit  5.45, CutoffScore  11.32, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW                                 
CUCAACUUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -11.01, deficit  6.73, CutoffScore  28.98, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
UAUAAAUGUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_84299.4,  8 NTs,             GAUAGUGGC,score     -10.95, deficit  5.66, CutoffScore  16.81, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGAAAGGCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -14.23, deficit  6.08, CutoffScore  19.74, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
UUUUGAAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_28252.8,  9 NTs,             GUUCAAGUC,score     -17.54, deficit 15.18, CutoffScore   1.21, ed  1, 0 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGAAAUUUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -12.47, deficit  3.13, CutoffScore  31.67, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUCGAAGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -10.42, deficit  1.08, CutoffScore   2.07, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GCCUGAGAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -12.59, deficit  4.28, CutoffScore  11.21, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAUAAAACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score      -8.87, deficit  0.55, CutoffScore  36.13, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AUCAACGAUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -11.95, deficit  6.38, CutoffScore  13.78, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
UGGAGUUAUA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_24792.1,  6 NTs,            GCCCGUUAUC,score     -13.51, deficit  7.08, CutoffScore   9.40, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWS-F-F-F                           
CAAGUCCUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -13.19, deficit  4.60, CutoffScore   4.14, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UCGAAGAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -12.60, deficit  5.53, CutoffScore  11.38, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUAAAAAGCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98864.1, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score      -9.03, deficit  4.40, CutoffScore  32.78, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGUUGUAGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score     -10.67, deficit  2.93, CutoffScore  13.78, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUUGUCCGAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_85434.1, 10 NTs,            GGUAUCCCAC,score     -12.97, deficit  7.39, CutoffScore  13.34, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGACCAGAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -12.16, deficit  4.09, CutoffScore  20.60, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AGGAAAAAUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -10.17, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  47.51, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAAUCUUCAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -12.06, deficit  4.93, CutoffScore  30.19, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
GUUCGUCAAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score      -8.93, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  72.54, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUCGAUCCCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_89881.5, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -14.39, deficit  9.57, CutoffScore   7.17, ed  4, 3 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUGCACAUAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50418.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGCAGGCAC,score     -14.54, deficit  5.60, CutoffScore   9.13, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
AUCGAAGAACU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50418.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGCAGGCAC,score     -13.81, deficit  4.87, CutoffScore  13.65, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGAUGCCGGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -12.68, deficit  3.81, CutoffScore  12.20, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUAUUAAUGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -13.15, deficit  3.86, CutoffScore  22.25, ed  4, 3 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
UCUCGAUAAAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -10.02, deficit  3.37, CutoffScore  26.66, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
UCUCCAAUUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -14.31, deficit  3.70, CutoffScore   1.57, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUAACAGUGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_25847.2, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUAAC,score     -11.98, deficit  7.64, CutoffScore  16.81, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F                     
CAAAAUCAAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_70751.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -11.65, deficit  4.91, CutoffScore  23.08, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GUAAAAGAACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -16.34, deficit  8.27, CutoffScore  26.41, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
GAGCUCCGAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_80411.1,  9 NTs,           CAGCCCGGUAG,score     -12.09, deficit  3.82, CutoffScore  28.64, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-cSH-F-F-F-F                       
CUGGCCGAUAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_23115.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -10.52, deficit  3.81, CutoffScore  32.69, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGUUCCAAUAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.71, deficit  2.10, CutoffScore  49.21, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAGAAGUCAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20781.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.16, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore   9.44, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAUCACAAUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -12.17, deficit  4.09, CutoffScore  49.00, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
AGUUUAGAGGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -10.59, deficit  2.78, CutoffScore  13.66, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GGAAAAAAGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -13.34, deficit  5.08, CutoffScore  30.37, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
CGACAAAGAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -10.81, deficit  1.46, CutoffScore  44.13, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AUUCCAAGAAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -13.08, deficit  6.43, CutoffScore  26.33, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
GCUCGCUAUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_24792.1,  6 NTs,            GCCCGUUAUC,score     -13.00, deficit  6.58, CutoffScore  12.24, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWS-F-F-F                           
CUCGAAACGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -16.71, deficit  8.64, CutoffScore  24.52, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
CUCUCUGCGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -14.66, deficit  5.78, CutoffScore   1.22, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAAUUAUUACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_81312.1, 10 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -14.34, deficit  8.05, CutoffScore   8.13, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
AUUUGCAGGCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -12.76, deficit  3.88, CutoffScore  45.11, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUGAAGUAAUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.29, deficit  4.24, CutoffScore  23.73, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUUUUUAACAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -11.57, deficit  4.91, CutoffScore  35.30, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
CAUCUAUUUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_94376.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -13.68, deficit  5.91, CutoffScore  17.90, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
AUGUGUAACUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_34964.1,  9 NTs,           AGAGGGGCUUU,score     -11.47, deficit  1.91, CutoffScore  31.44, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUGUGUCGUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93135.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -12.92, deficit  4.39, CutoffScore   0.45, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUUGGUAGAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -10.37, deficit  3.38, CutoffScore  31.25, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
AGGCUCAUUUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -12.38, deficit  4.64, CutoffScore  10.73, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUUAGAUGAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_19210.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score      -9.58, deficit  4.76, CutoffScore  40.49, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUGGAUCGACA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50418.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGCAGGCAC,score     -13.82, deficit  4.88, CutoffScore  13.62, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GUUCUUUAGUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score      -9.58, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  49.75, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F                         
CUGGACCACAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -17.00, deficit  9.88, CutoffScore   3.51, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UAUGUUAAAGA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -13.56, deficit  6.90, CutoffScore   5.72, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
GAAAAAAAAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_20781.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -10.14, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  39.07, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGUCACGAGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -16.36, deficit  8.58, CutoffScore  12.08, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F                     
GGUGAGAGAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -13.96, deficit  5.81, CutoffScore  21.51, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUGAGGGUGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -15.86, deficit  7.09, CutoffScore  11.70, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GUUGGAGACAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_29129.3,  8 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -14.37, deficit  7.49, CutoffScore  20.70, ed  3, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
GAAAAAAACAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_47732.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -12.72, deficit  5.86, CutoffScore  27.46, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGGACAAUUUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -12.30, deficit  2.18, CutoffScore  15.11, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAGGAGAUGUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -16.75, deficit  5.98, CutoffScore   6.00, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GGUGUGUUGAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -15.12, deficit  6.98, CutoffScore  13.77, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUUAAAAGCAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19210.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -15.35, deficit 10.53, CutoffScore   8.60, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAGGAAUCGAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_41902.1, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -14.13, deficit  7.51, CutoffScore   2.43, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-cWH-F-F-F-F-F                   
GUACUUGGACAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_12870.1, 12 NTs,         GUCCUUGGGAAAC,score     -16.56, deficit  9.09, CutoffScore   0.31, ed  3, 3 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F               
CGGACCCAGUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -12.34, deficit  2.23, CutoffScore  14.83, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AGUGACAUCGAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -17.18, deficit  6.41, CutoffScore   3.74, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GGAAGCAAAUAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -12.65, deficit  2.54, CutoffScore  30.92, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGGUAGAAUUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -16.24, deficit  5.84, CutoffScore   7.66, ed  5, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
UAUAACGUCACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -15.36, deficit  7.29, CutoffScore   0.51, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
UUAAUUUGUUUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -14.85, deficit  6.08, CutoffScore   0.78, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GGUCGAUGUGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16991.1,  8 NTs,          UGUGGAGGAGUA,score     -12.11, deficit  5.64, CutoffScore   9.61, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F                     
CGAAAAAAAUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -16.98, deficit  8.91, CutoffScore   7.62, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
GAAAAAAUGUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_23509.1, 11 NTs,          GAAUUCAUUUUC,score     -11.65, deficit  6.19, CutoffScore   9.05, ed  4, 4 cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CAGGCAAUAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_01255.1,  8 NTs,          CAUCCAGUAAAG,score     -12.14, deficit  3.81, CutoffScore  28.14, ed  3, 3 F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AUUCGAAAUACU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -11.97, deficit  1.36, CutoffScore  35.04, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GCCGUGCGAUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -12.28, deficit  4.20, CutoffScore   2.91, ed  5, 5 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUUGGCACGGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41902.1, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -16.23, deficit  9.61, CutoffScore   6.97, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-cWH-F-F-F-F-F                   
UAGGGAUCAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41902.1, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -12.88, deficit  6.26, CutoffScore  23.68, ed  4, 3 cWW-cWW-cWH-F-F-F-F-F                   
GGUCGUAAAGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_16991.1,  8 NTs,          UGUGGAGGAGUA,score     -13.19, deficit  6.71, CutoffScore   4.09, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F                     
CUGAAAAAUGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -14.82, deficit  4.71, CutoffScore   0.01, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUUGUUGAAAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -15.09, deficit  6.33, CutoffScore  15.91, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CGAGGAGAAUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -16.94, deficit  8.87, CutoffScore   7.85, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
CAGGUCGAAUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -16.87, deficit  6.26, CutoffScore   4.32, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGUUAAUAAAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -14.29, deficit  7.63, CutoffScore  19.18, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
UGGAGGGAUGAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68572.1,  9 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -20.57, deficit  6.44, CutoffScore   7.48, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGAAGUAUGGAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -16.46, deficit  5.68, CutoffScore   7.53, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CAAUAUGAAGUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -13.09, deficit  3.76, CutoffScore   1.66, ed  5, 5 cWW-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F                 
AAAAUCCAGAACU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88558.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -16.03, deficit  7.37, CutoffScore   7.47, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GUUAAUAAUGAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_07583.1, 12 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -13.74, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  36.50, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
CCAAUUCGUAACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -15.86, deficit  7.79, CutoffScore  13.43, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
AUCGGUGAGUUAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20751.2, 13 NTs,        CAGGGGAGGAAUCG,score     -17.56, deficit  8.94, CutoffScore   6.99, ed  4, 3 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F               
GUCCGAGAAAACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -15.67, deficit  4.93, CutoffScore   5.11, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
CUUAAAAGGGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07583.1, 12 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -15.64, deficit  2.41, CutoffScore   3.80, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
UGGAUCGGAAGAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_68767.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -16.44, deficit  8.14, CutoffScore  25.11, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F                       
CUAAAUAACGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_47732.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -16.29, deficit  9.43, CutoffScore   5.68, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CCUAUAAAUCUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -11.75, deficit  1.35, CutoffScore  15.38, ed  7, 5 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
GUCAGACGUGACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -14.73, deficit  6.66, CutoffScore   3.78, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
GCAAAAAAACUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_47732.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -13.77, deficit  6.91, CutoffScore   2.73, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GCAAUUUGUCGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68767.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -14.32, deficit  6.03, CutoffScore   4.55, ed  4, 4 cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F                       
GUUCUGAAAAUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -13.86, deficit  3.46, CutoffScore  20.01, ed  4, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
GGAAAAAAUGUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -12.89, deficit  4.82, CutoffScore  44.22, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
UGAGUAUAUACAUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16398.2,  8 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -13.88, deficit  1.73, CutoffScore   2.00, ed  7, 5 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAAAUCACCAUAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_92488.1, 13 NTs,      GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC,score     -19.40, deficit  7.18, CutoffScore   1.13, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F               
AUGGAGAUGUGAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68572.1,  9 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -18.18, deficit  4.05, CutoffScore   3.82, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
AGUCUGCUGAAAAGGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91641.1, 16 NTs,     AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU,score     -17.53, deficit  4.79, CutoffScore   1.80, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-cSW-F-F-F-F         
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc[10 10]	 94.0000	 12.0000	  2.0000
[11 11]	 86.0000	  2.0000	  0.0000
[12 12]	 52.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[13 13]	 34.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[14 14]	  6.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[15 15]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[16 16]	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[17 17]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[18 18]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[19 19]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[20 20]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[21 21]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[22 22]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[23 23]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[24 24]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[25 25]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[26 26]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[27 27]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[4 4]	100.0000	 82.0000	 78.0000
[40 40]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[41 41]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[5 5]	100.0000	 94.0000	 68.0000
[6 6]	100.0000	 88.0000	 48.0000
[7 7]	100.0000	 58.0000	 16.0000
[8 8]	100.0000	 34.0000	  6.0000
[9 9]	100.0000	 10.0000	  0.0000
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc




Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_02581.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.32%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-tSW-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_07480.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_07903.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_09260.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_10456.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cWW-tWW-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCAGGGGAGGAAUCGG
Model HL_11542.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCGGCCAAAG
Model HL_12758.3  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-cHW-F-F-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-F-tSH-F-cHW-F-cWH-cWH, sequence CGAAGGUGAGGAGAGGCGAGGAAGAG
Model HL_13971.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-tSW-F-tSH-tSH-cWW-F-F, sequence UUCCCGUCCGAUCA
Model HL_14757.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSW-tWW-cWW-tHW-tSW-F-cWH-F, sequence CCUGACUUCUAUACUAAG
Model HL_15118.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_21400.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tSW-cWW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH, sequence AGGUGGGUGGUGUGGAGGAGUAU
Model HL_28252.8  matched a sequence   0 times, TP  97.86%, TN  96.02%, 140 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCAAGUC
Model HL_29958.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_31581.6  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.55%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cHS-F-F-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_33074.4  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.31%,  22 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_35354.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cHW-F-cWH-cHW-F-F-tHH-cWH-tWW-cWH-F-tWW-cWH-F-cWH, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_50851.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAGGCGGUUGGU
Model HL_51921.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tSS-tHS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAAUUGCAGAUAUUCGUGAA
Model HL_55305.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWS-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_60293.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWH-F-cWH-cHW-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-F-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_63355.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_64292.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCCCAUUCGGGUCU
Model HL_66482.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWW-F-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAUCCGAGUUGCAAGAG
Model HL_73183.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_73247.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.63%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUACACGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_73916.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUAGCUCAGUCGGUAGAGCAGGGGAUUGAAAAUUCCGAGU
Model HL_74055.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-cWH-tSH-tHW-tHW-tSW, sequence CUGAAAGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_74379.3  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGUUAACC
Model HL_81205.3  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_84847.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-tWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGCAACCAUCC
Model HL_85461.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAGCCAUUUAUGGCGAAC
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.67%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_88364.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.72%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_89346.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAAGGGGGCAACUCCAUCU
Model HL_97756.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cSH-cWS-F-tSW-cSW-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence UACCCAUCCCGAACA
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.19%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_99324.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_04725.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-cWW-cWW-cWS, sequence GUUACUUAGUUC
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.17%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_20751.2  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_23010.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_23115.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_23509.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.35%,   1 instances, signature cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAUUCAUUUUC
Model HL_49941.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGUGGUUAG
Model HL_67407.5  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACCGUCUGG
Model HL_70751.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_88558.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_89881.5  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_91641.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_93616.2  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.52%,   8 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_01255.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCAGUAAAG
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_25847.2  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F, sequence GUAACUAUAAC
Model HL_36684.4  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUUUUAAUC
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_02887.3  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_05304.3  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_07583.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_09452.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGGCUA
Model HL_16398.2  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_16991.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAGGAGUA
Model HL_24792.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F, sequence GCCCGUUAUC
Model HL_32735.2  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_40252.4  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_41902.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_45785.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence GUUCCCUCACC
Model HL_58224.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_59330.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_68257.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAACGCUUGCGUUU
Model HL_68572.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_68767.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_78284.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGAGAUGAG
Model HL_80411.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_81312.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.51%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_87463.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_93135.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_93383.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCCCUAAGC
Model HL_94376.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_97983.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_04171.7  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.78%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_42998.2  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAAC
Model HL_47732.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_50779.4  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAACGC
Model HL_69139.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUUUUAUUG
Model HL_74292.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.13%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_80599.2  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_85434.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAUCCCAC
Model HL_06059.6  matched a sequence   5 times, TP  98.04%, TN  96.01%,  51 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCCCAAG
Model HL_29762.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_38649.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_55436.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCCCAGAC
Model HL_57863.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAAGGAGGUC
Model HL_85993.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_88205.2  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F, sequence ACGUGCAAAU
Model HL_89567.2  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_99769.3  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_04642.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_06226.4  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_19210.3  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_21372.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_35677.3  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUUUGCUA
Model HL_45175.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_70658.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_80241.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGUUUCCA
Model HL_80362.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_89199.2  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_93438.2  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_99040.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGCGG
Model HL_99867.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_15802.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUCUGGAU
Model HL_18978.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F, sequence CUGUUCGCAG
Model HL_33983.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_34964.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAGGGGCUUU
Model HL_37369.2  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   9 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_37824.7  matched a sequence   7 times, TP  97.42%, TN  95.93%, 349 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_41543.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGCAGCCCGUC
Model HL_60266.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAAAAGAC
Model HL_67667.2  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_72628.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_73266.9  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  13 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence GCCUUAAAC
Model HL_83632.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUCCAGAU
Model HL_85367.2  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGGGGCGG
Model HL_86012.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_01962.2  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tWH-F, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_07951.3  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAGCGGAAG
Model HL_18423.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHS-F, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_27670.2  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  13 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F, sequence GUGACAGCC
Model HL_29129.3  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_38808.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-cWW, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_50418.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAGGCAC
Model HL_51447.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGUCG
Model HL_67079.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_81545.2  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_83808.4  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_91503.7  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_91939.2  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_98864.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_00914.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCAAAC
Model HL_20781.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_22622.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACGGUUG
Model HL_25967.2  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_26631.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.40%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_81538.2  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  16 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAACAC
Model HL_15574.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_22584.6  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  26 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_28791.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_34617.5  matched a sequence  10 times, TP  98.25%, TN  96.01%,  57 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_38046.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_84299.4  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAGUGGC
Model HL_01609.3  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  18 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence CUGGAAAG
Model HL_04641.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGACGACG
Model HL_18565.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_20743.5  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_30680.3  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.43%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_36335.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_37344.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCAUUCGG
Model HL_53504.3  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAGUCAUAAG
Model HL_75293.5  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGAAAUU
Model HL_77600.2  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAAUUCC
Model HL_10540.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.83%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAGG
Model HL_47854.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_50860.2  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCGGACAU
Model HL_53454.2  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_61996.2  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_64690.6  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGACGAC
Model HL_77082.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAAAG
Model HL_80008.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_04259.3  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUACAAG
Model HL_08100.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCGCG
Model HL_20167.2  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_25061.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_26934.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_66853.7  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_73255.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_86883.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.79%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_30068.2  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.53%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAAGCAUA
Model HL_42046.2  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSS-F-F-F, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_56676.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.45%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_59735.5  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.84%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_76094.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAAUG
Model HL_86769.4  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cSH-F, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_89893.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.80%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGAGCG
Model HL_02817.2  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAAAUAG
Model HL_47787.2  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCCG
Model HL_65313.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUUUG
Model HL_93324.4  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.51%,  24 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_10453.3  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Model HL_13529.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAACUG
Model HL_20811.4  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_77436.5  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  23 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAAUUG
Model HL_78347.4  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.86%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_87553.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.81%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_39243.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_41464.2  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUAAAAC
Model HL_49922.4  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.09%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_50537.6  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_99748.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_78197.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUGGCC
Model HL_50318.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_13963.3  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.41%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGCGAC
Model HL_28075.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_55195.3  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.67%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_62934.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_71391.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_52953.3  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.85%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_29966.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_87954.2  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.35%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_20535.2  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.69%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAAUAC
Model HL_31585.4  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.04%,  20 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_65794.5  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.49%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCA
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_66103.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.50%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_80922.2  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.40%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_97917.2  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.79%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_59843.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.05%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UCAAUGA
Model HL_80709.3  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.74%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_81100.2  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.51%,   3 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_43517.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_22135.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UCCAA
Model HL_46501.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.12%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS, sequence CUGAAG
Model HL_07886.3  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.83%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_32392.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_57176.2  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GCUGAUC
Model HL_93535.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.65%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCG
Model HL_82710.2  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_86870.2  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUUC
Model HL_94980.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUUG
Model HL_27483.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence GCUUCUGC
Model HL_35941.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.86%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_48778.2  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.10%,  46 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCGUG
Model HL_57875.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.70%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGUUUC
Model HL_38168.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.17%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CAAAG
Model HL_38901.2  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.36%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_69752.2  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.63%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_50006.2  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_78677.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUCG
Model HL_32346.4  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.41%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_04783.2  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_48417.5  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.33%,  26 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_53890.2  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.39%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_13189.1  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.64%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUCGG
Model HL_75660.5  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  61.35%,  19 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CACAG
Model HL_56334.1  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  57.50%,  16 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_56131.2  matched a sequence 114 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.39%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Model HL_70782.2  matched a sequence 119 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.65%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCUCAG
Overall false positive rate is 33.6154%
Number of models giving false positives is 213 out of 253
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     8.38
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    14.62
